The NATO summit in Lisbon will decide where to shift
currently about 200 tactical nuclear warheads on European soil,
scattered among Belgium, Italy, Germany, Holland and Turkey.
shift where, as Belgium, Holland, Germany and others - having
misunderstood, of course, the promises of Obama
to go to a drastic reduction of nuclear weapons-had declared
not love her more about their areas? It remains, therefore
Turkey and Italy.
But Turkey's Erdogan has recently become an ally
very uncomfortable.
And not only is it unlikely that someone
face such a proposal, but is even less likely that Ankara would accept.
remains, apparently, Italy, which on its 80
atomic bombs scattered around its territory has never said a word, or to
times the center-left or the right to present times. And today, with Berlusconi
shaky, in need of aid
dell'abbronzato
president, can not wait to accept. Meanwhile, those weapons do not even tickle
Putin friend.
The fact is that the decision has not gone unnoticed in Europe.
a large group of European political leaders of pre-11 September
have raised their voices in protest, because they keep us
atomic bombs? And what is NATO's role in this phase?
were big names and remain open even today are Helmut Schmidt, former German Chancellor
, the former Belgian foreign minister, Willy Claes,
the former British Foreign Secretary Des Browne, and former Prime Minister
Netherlands, Ruud Lubbers. And the same questions are irritated
echoed in numerous other smaller European capitals, once
prostrate in front of Washington. Of course
in the deathly silence of Rome.
Everybody thinks, like us, those that do not add to 200 atomic bombs
our security. Everyone thinks that, indeed, are dangerous only
for us Europeans.
But you can not really say that are useless. A
need something: to force us to take home the U.S. bases, that is
keep us tied hand and foot, to the United States. Who,
falling - as they are doing (and not a few Europeans are starting to notice
) - drag us down, too ...
0 comments:
Post a Comment